Hepatitis C viremic lung transplantation to aviremic recipients: Comprehensive outcomes and post-transplant viremia.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has revolutionized solid organ transplantation by providing an opportunity to utilize organs from HCV-viremic donors. Though transplantation of HCV-viremic donor organs into aviremic recipients is safe in the short term, midterm data on survival and post-transplant complications is lacking. We provide a midterm assessment of complications of lung transplantation (LT) up to 2 years post-transplant, including patient and graft survival between HCV-viremic transplantation (D+) and HCV-aviremic transplantation (D-). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including 500 patients from 2018 to 2022 who underwent LT at our quaternary care institution. Outcomes of patients receiving D+ grafts were compared to those receiving D- grafts. Recipients of HCV antibody+ but PCR- grafts were treated as D- recipients. RESULTS: We identified 470 D- and 30 D+ patients meeting inclusion criteria. Crude mortality did not differ between groups (p = .43). Patient survival at years 1 and 2 did not differ between D+ and D- patients (p = .89, p = .87, respectively), and graft survival at years 1 and 2 did not differ between the two groups (p = .90, p = .88, respectively). No extrahepatic manifestations or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) occurred among D+ recipients. D+ and D- patients had similar rates of post-transplant chronic lung allograft rejection (CLAD) (p = 6.7% vs. 12.8%, p = .3), acute cellular rejection (60.0% vs. 58.0%, p = .8) and antibody-mediated rejection (16.7% vs. 14.2%, p = .7). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in midterm patient or graft survival between D+ and D-LT. No extrahepatic manifestations of HCV occurred. No differences in any type of rejection including CLAD were observed, though follow-up for CLAD was limited. These results provide additional support for the use of HCV-viremic organs in selected recipients in LT.

Retransplantation for COVID-19-related lung graft failure: A case report of successful outcome in a critically ill lung transplant recipient.

End-stage lung disease from nonrecovered COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome has become an increasingly frequent indication for lung transplant. Although reports of lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with COVID-19 suggest an increased risk for hospitalization, respiratory failure, and death, little is known about retransplant for COVID-19-related lung graft failure. In this manuscript, we present a 49-year-old man who received bilateral lung retransplantation for COVID-19-related lung graft failure, 7½ years after his initial transplant for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Our case suggests that retransplantation may be a viable option for critically ill LTRs with COVID-19-related graft failure, even in the presence of other organ dysfunction, provided that they are in good condition and have an immunologically favorable donor.

Mechanical thrombectomy for acute pulmonary embolism in lung transplant recipients.

The rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) are high among lung transplant (LT) recipients. Management is challenging because of elevated bleeding risks and inadequacy of conventional PE risk stratification tools. New percutaneous large bore mechanical thrombectomy catheters are being increasingly used effectively to debulk thrombus and restore flow immediately. We describe the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in 8 LT recipients. All patients were diagnosed with intermediate/high-risk proximal PE involving the allograft and underwent successful MT within 30 hours of diagnosis. Estimated blood loss was between 200 and 450 cc, with 3 patients requiring blood transfusions. Improvement in heart rate and oxygenation was seen in all 8 patients after the procedure. In the 30 days after MT, 7 of 8 patients survived. One patient died from major bleeding occurred 16 days after MT and 5 days after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator decannulation. Mechanical thrombectomy may provide a feasible management strategy in select LT recipients with pulmonary embolism.

Implementation of routine Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

Lung transplant recipients are at an increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), and those who develop CDI post-transplant can have worsened outcomes including graft failure and death. We sought to describe the efficacy and safety of primary CDI prophylaxis with oral vancomycin among 86 adult lung transplant recipients. Overall, we observed a 9.3% (8/86) incidence of CDI among patients receiving prophylaxis, with the majority of infections occurring a median of 25 days after completion of prophylaxis. Furthermore, we observed a 4.7% incidence of VRE infection/colonization. Opportunities exist to optimize the duration of CDI prophylaxis to balance the benefits and risks in lung transplant recipients.

Anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether continuing anti-fibrotic therapy until the time of lung transplant increases the risk of complications in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis affects the risk of complications. METHODS: We assessed intra-operative and post-transplant complications among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who underwent lung transplant and had been treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone continuously for ⩾ 90 days at listing. Patients were grouped according to whether they had a shorter (⩽ 5 medication half-lives) or longer (> 5 medication half-lives) time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic medication and transplant. Five half-lives corresponded to 2 days for nintedanib and 1 day for pirfenidone. RESULTS: Among patients taking nintedanib (n = 107) or pirfenidone (n = 190), 211 (71.0%) had discontinued anti-fibrotic therapy ⩽ 5 medication half-lives before transplant. Anastomotic and sternal dehiscence occurred only in this group (anastomotic: 11 patients [5.2%], p = 0.031 vs patients with longer time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic medication and transplant; sternal: 12 patients [5.7%], p = 0.024). No differences were observed in surgical wound dehiscence, length of hospital stay, or survival to discharge between groups with a shorter versus longer time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy and transplant. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic and sternal dehiscence only occurred in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who discontinued anti-fibrotic therapy < 5 medication half-lives before transplant. The frequency of other intra-operative and post-transplant complications did not appear to differ depending on when anti-fibrotic therapy was discontinued. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04316780: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04316780.

Effect of donor smoking and substance use on post-lung transplant outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine effects of donor smoking and substance use on primary graft dysfunction, allograft function, and survival after lung transplant. METHODS: From January 2007 to February 2020, 1366 lung transplants from 1291 donors were performed in 1352 recipients at Cleveland Clinic. Donor smoking and substance use history were extracted from the Uniform Donor Risk Assessment Interview and medical records. End points were post-transplant primary graft dysfunction, longitudinal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% of predicted), and survival. RESULTS: Among lung transplant recipients, 670 (49%) received an organ from a donor smoker, 163 (25%) received an organ from a donor with a 20 pack-year or more history (median pack-years 8), and 702 received an organ from a donor with substance use (51%). There was no association of donor smoking, pack-years, or substance use with primary graft dysfunction (P > .2). Post-transplant forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 74% at 1 year in donor nonsmoker recipients and 70% in donor smoker recipients (P = .0002), confined to double-lung transplant, where forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 77% in donor nonsmoker recipients and 73% in donor smoker recipients. Donor substance use was not associated with allograft function. Donor smoking was associated with 54% non-risk-adjusted 5-year survival versus 59% (P = .09) and greater pack-years with slightly worse risk-adjusted long-term survival (P = .01). Donor substance use was not associated with any outcome (P ≥ 8). CONCLUSIONS: Among well-selected organs, lungs from smokers were associated with non-clinically important worse allograft outcomes without an inflection point for donor smoking pack-years. Substance use was not associated with worse allograft function. Given the paucity of organs, donor smoking or substance use alone should not preclude assessment for lung donation or transplant.

Early posttransplant reductions in club cell secretory protein associate with future risk for chronic allograft dysfunction in lung recipients: results from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) increases morbidity and mortality for lung transplant recipients. Club cell secretory protein (CCSP), produced by airway club cells, is reduced in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of lung recipients with CLAD. We sought to understand the relationship between BALF CCSP and early posttransplant allograft injury and determine if early posttransplant BALF CCSP reductions indicate later CLAD risk. METHODS: We quantified CCSP and total protein in 1606 BALF samples collected over the first posttransplant year from 392 adult lung recipients at 5 centers. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the correlation of allograft histology or infection events with protein-normalized BALF CCSP. We performed multivariable Cox regression to determine the association between a time-dependent binary indicator of normalized BALF CCSP level below the median in the first posttransplant year and development of probable CLAD. RESULTS: Normalized BALF CCSP concentrations were 19% to 48% lower among samples corresponding to histological allograft injury as compared with healthy samples. Patients who experienced any occurrence of a normalized BALF CCSP level below the median over the first posttransplant year had a significant increase in probable CLAD risk independent of other factors previously linked to CLAD (adjusted hazard ratio 1.95; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: We discovered a threshold for reduced BALF CCSP to discriminate future CLAD risk; supporting the utility of BALF CCSP as a tool for early posttransplant risk stratification. Additionally, our finding that low CCSP associates with future CLAD underscores a role for club cell injury in CLAD pathobiology.

A randomized controlled trial of presatovir for respiratory syncytial virus after lung transplant.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant recipients is associated with high morbidity. This study evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in RSV-infected lung transplant recipients. METHODS: In this international Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02534350), adult lung transplant recipients with symptomatic confirmed RSV infection for ≤7 days received oral presatovir 200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 14, or placebo (2:1), with follow-up through day 28. There were 2 coprimary endpoints: time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7, calculated from nasal swabs, in the full analysis set ([FAS]; all patients who received study drug and had quantifiable baseline nasal RSV load) and time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7 in the subset of patients with pretreatment symptom duration at the median or shorter of the FAS. Secondary endpoints were changes in respiratory infection symptoms assessed using the Influenza Patient-Reported Outcomes questionnaire and lung function measured by spirometry. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were randomized, 40 received presatovir, 20 placebo, and 54 were included in efficacy analyses. Presatovir did not significantly improve the primary endpoint in the FAS (treatment difference [95% CI], 0.10 [-0.43, 0.63] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.72) or the shorter symptom-duration subgroup (-0.12 [-0.94, 0.69] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were not different between presatovir and placebo groups. Presatovir was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Presatovir treatment did not significantly improve change in nasal RSV load, symptoms, or lung function in lung transplant recipients.

The Past, Present, and Near Future of Lung Allocation in the United States.

The first official donor lung allocation system in the United States was initiated by the United Network of Organ Sharing in 1990. The initial policy for lung allocation was simple with donor lungs allocated based on ABO match and the amount of time the candidates accrued on the waiting list. Donor offers were first given to candidates' donor service area. In March 2005, the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) was the major change in organ allocation. International adoption of the LAS-based allocation system can be seen worldwide.

Reflux Surgery in Lung Transplantation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration has been associated with graft dysfunction after lung transplantation, leading some to advocate for selective use of fundoplication despite minimal data supporting this practice. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study at 4 academic lung transplant centers to determine the association of gastroesophageal reflux disease and fundoplication with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and survival using Cox multivariable regression. RESULTS: Of 542 patients, 136 (25.1%) underwent fundoplication; 99 (18%) were found to have reflux disease without undergoing fundoplication. Blanking the first year after transplantation, fundoplication was not associated with a benefit regarding freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58-1.49) or death (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.47-1.99) compared with reflux disease without fundoplication. However, a time-dependent adjusted analysis found a slight decrease in mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.23; P = .157), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.42-1.11; P = .126), and combined bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or death (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.42-1.04; P = .073) in the fundoplication group compared with the gastroesophageal reflux disease group. CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistically significant benefit from fundoplication was not determined because of limited sample size, follow-up, and potential for selection bias, a randomized, prospective study is still warranted.

Place-based heterogeneity in lung transplant recipient outcomes.

Place is defined as a social or environmental area of residence with meaning to a patient. We hypothesize there is an association between place and the clinical outcomes of lung transplant recipients in the United States. In a retrospective cohort study of transplants between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the association between place (through social and environmental factors) with readmission, lung rejection, and survival. Among 18,465 recipients, only 20% resided in the same county as the transplant center. Recipients from the most socially vulnerable counties when compared to the least vulnerable were more likely to have COPD as a native disease, Black or African American race, and travel long distances to reach a transplant center. Higher local life expectancy was associated with lower likelihood for readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84, 0.98, p = .01). Higher social vulnerability was associated with a higher likelihood of lung rejection (OR = 1.37, [CI]: 1.07, 1.76, p = .01). There was no association of residence with posttransplant survival. Recipient place-based factors were associated with complications and processes of care after transplant and warrant further investigation.

Prognostic implications of and clinical risk factors for acute lung injury and organizing pneumonia after lung transplantation: Data from a multicenter prospective cohort study.

We determined prognostic implications of acute lung injury (ALI) and organizing pneumonia (OP), including timing relative to transplantation, in a multicenter lung recipient cohort. We sought to understand clinical risks that contribute to development of ALI/OP. We analyzed prospective, histologic diagnoses of ALI and OP in 4786 lung biopsies from 803 adult lung recipients. Univariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the impact of early (≤90 days) or late (>90 days) posttransplant ALI or OP on risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) or death/retransplantation. These analyses demonstrated late ALI/OP conferred a two- to threefold increase in the hazards of CLAD or death/retransplantation; there was no association between early ALI/OP and these outcomes. To determine risk factors for late ALI/OP, we used univariable Cox models considering donor/recipient characteristics and posttransplant events as candidate risks. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction, higher degree of donor/recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatch, bacterial or viral respiratory infection, and an early ALI/OP event were significantly associated with increased late ALI/OP risk. These data from a contemporary, multicenter cohort underscore the prognostic implications of ALI/OP on lung recipient outcomes, clarify the importance of the timing of these events, and identify clinical risks to target for ALI/OP prevention.

Plasma CXCL9 and CXCL10 at allograft injury predict chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

Histopathologic lung allograft injuries are putative harbingers for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). However, the mechanisms responsible are not well understood. CXCL9 and CXCL10 are potent chemoattractants of mononuclear cells and potential propagators of allograft injury. We hypothesized that these chemokines would be quantifiable in plasma, and would associate with subsequent CLAD development. In this prospective multicenter study, we evaluated 721 plasma samples for CXCL9/CXCL10 levels from 184 participants at the time of transbronchial biopsies during their first-year post-transplantation. We determined the association between plasma chemokines, histopathologic injury, and CLAD risk using Cox proportional hazards models. We also evaluated CXCL9/CXCL10 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and compared plasma to BAL with respect to CLAD risk. Plasma CXCL9/CXCL10 levels were elevated during the injury patterns associated with CLAD, acute rejection, and acute lung injury, with a dose-response relationship between chemokine levels and CLAD risk. Importantly, there were strong interactions between injury and plasma CXCL9/CXCL10, where histopathologic injury associated with CLAD only in the presence of elevated plasma chemokines. We observed similar associations and interactions with BAL CXCL9/CXCL10 levels. Elevated plasma CXCL9/CXCL10 during allograft injury may contribute to CLAD pathogenesis and has potential as a minimally invasive immune monitoring biomarker.

Infectious Complications in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Infection remains a common cause of death throughout the lifespan of a lung transplant recipient. The increased susceptibility of lung transplant recipients is multifactorial including exposure of the graft to the external environment, impaired mucociliary clearance, and high levels of immunosuppression. Long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients remain poor compared with other solid organ transplants largely due to deaths from infections and chronic allograft dysfunction. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis may be used after lung transplantation to target a number of different opportunistic infections for varying durations of time. The first-month posttransplant is most commonly characterized by nosocomial infections and donor-derived infections. Following the first month to the first 6 months after transplant-a period of intense immunosuppression-is associated with opportunistic infections. While immunosuppression is reduced after the first year posttransplant, infection remains a risk with community-acquired and rarer infectious agents. Clinicians should be vigilant for infection at all time points after transplant. The use of patient-tailored prophylaxis and treatments help ensure graft and patient survival.

Clinical significance of donor lung weight at procurement and during ex vivo lung perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Elevated donor lung weight may adversely affect donor lung transplant suitability and post-transplant outcomes. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of lung weight after procurement and ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) on transplant suitability, post-transplant graft dysfunction, and clinical outcomes and define the donor lung weight range most relevant to clinical outcomes. METHODS: From February 2016 to August 2020, 365 human lung donors to a single transplant center were retrospectively reviewed. 239 were transplanted without EVLP, 74 treated with EVLP (50 went on to transplant), and 52 declined for transplant without EVLP consideration. Donor lung weights were measured immediately after procurement and, when performed, after EVLP. Lung weights were adjusted by donor height and divided into 4 quartiles. RESULTS: Donor lungs in the highest weight quartile at donor hospital had a significantly lower transplant suitability rate after EVLP, higher rates of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours, and longer intensive care unit/hospital stay. For lungs treated with lung perfusion, the highest lung weight quartile at the end of lung perfusion was associated with a significantly lower transplant suitability rate, higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours, and longer intensive care unit/hospital stay, compared to the other categories. CONCLUSIONS: Donor lung weight stratified by quartile categories can assist decision-making regarding need for EVLP at the donor hospital as well as during EVLP evaluation. Caution should be used when considering donor lungs in the highest weight quartile for transplantation.

Advanced Circulatory Support and Lung Transplantation in Pulmonary Hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive fatal disease. Although medical therapies have improved the outlook for these patients, there still exists a cohort of patients with PAH who are refractory to these therapies. Lung transplantation (LT), and in certain cases heart-lung transplantation (HLT), is a therapeutic option for patients with severe PAH who are receiving optimal therapy yet declining. ECMO may serve as a bridge to transplant or recovery in appropriate patients. Although, the mortality within the first 3 months after transplant is higher in PAH recipients than the other indications for LT, and the long-term survival after LT is excellent for this group of individuals. In this review, we discuss the indications for LT in PAH patients, when to refer and list patients for LT, the indications for double lung transplant (DLT) versus HLT for PAH patients, types of advanced circulatory support for severe PAH, and short and long-term outcomes in transplant recipients with PAH.

Intragraft Hyaluronan Increases in Association With Acute Lung Transplant Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Acute perivascular rejection (AR) is common in lung recipients and increases the risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Hyaluronan (HA), an extracellular matrix constituent, accumulates in experimental AR and can act as an innate immune agonist, breaking tolerance and potentiating alloimmunity. We previously demonstrated HA accumulates in CLAD after human-lung transplantation. We sought to determine if HA accumulates in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) concurrent with AR in lung recipients. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 126 first adult lung recipients at 5 transplant centers with a total of 373 BALF samples collected within the first posttransplant year. All samples were paired with a lung biopsy from the same bronchoscopy. BALF HA (ng/mL) was quantified by ELISA and log-transformed for analysis. Linear-mixed effect models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to estimate the association between BALF HA concentration and the presence of AR on biopsy. The association between early posttransplant BALF HA levels and the development of CLAD was explored utilizing tertiles of maximum BALF HA level observed within the first 6 months of transplant. RESULTS: In analyses adjusted for potential confounders, BALF HA concentration was significantly increased in association with AR (change in means on log-scale 0.31; 95% CI, 0.01-0.60; P = 0.044). When considered on the original scale (ng/mL), BALF HA concentrations were 1.36 times (36%) higher, on average, among samples with, versus without, AR. The cumulative incidence of CLAD was numerically higher in individuals in the highest tertiles of BALF HA level within the first 6 months after transplant, as compared with those in the lowest tertile; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate accumulation of HA in clinical AR and suggest a mechanism by which innate and adaptive immune activation might interact in the development of AR and CLAD.

Pre-transplant vaccination compliance in adult heart and lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Vaccine preventable diseases can affect solid organ transplant recipients post-transplant. Therefore, the administration of vaccines and assessment of serologic response should be prioritized in the pre-transplant period. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included 349 adult heart or lung transplant candidates between December 1, 2017 and November 30, 2019. We describe vaccination or serologic status for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, pneumococcal, influenza, and other recommended vaccinations among heart or lung transplant candidates. RESULTS: Eighty-two heart transplant candidates (91%) and 77 lung transplant candidates (30%) received an ID consult prior to transplant. More patients completed the pneumococcal series (66.7% vs. 28.6%, P = .045) in the heart transplant group that received an ID consult. In the lung transplant group, patients with an ID consult demonstrated higher rates of immunity to hepatitis A (84.4% vs. 72.9%, P = .047), hepatitis B (75.3% vs. 56.9%, P = .005), and measles (71.4% vs. 52.5%, P = .005) compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the value of consulting ID and administering vaccinations in the early evaluation phase, prior to transplant listing. Opportunities remain to better optimize vaccination rates prior to transplant in heart and lung transplant candidates.